Fatcow Icon
Only in NC do taxes, healthcare take back seat to possums
Feb 08, 2013 | 2312 views | 1 1 comments | 8 8 recommendations | email to a friend | print

The North Carolina General Assembly is in the midst of some hard work, with a number of challenges facing the state.

The legislators are trying to put together an amendment to the state constitution which would give landowners more protection against eminent domain actions; the state is facing continuing budget issues; there is still talk of significant changes to the state tax code; the GOP-controlled Assembly is considering major cuts in jobless benefits; and weighing whether to participate, and to what degree, in the federal healthcare overhaul.

Those are but a handful of the weighty issues facing legislators.

So, given an overwhelming crush of bills to consider, some of which will have significant effects on North Carolina residents for years, why is the General Assembly wasting time and resources considering a possum drop bill?

You read that right — a possum drop bill.

Seems the tiny community of Brasstown, in the far western portion of the state, has a tradition of dropping a possum from a tall pole each New Year’s Eve.

Officials there trap a wild opossum, shove it in a cage, lift it to the top of the pole where it’s left for some time, then slowly lower it during the final countdown to the New Year, similar to the famous dropping of the ball in New York.

This year, the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals filed suit and successfully stopped the practice, on grounds that it was cruel to the animal and violated state law. Even though the town received a permit for the actions from the Wildlife Resources Commission, PETA successfully argued under state law the commission did not have the authority to grant such a license.

Now Brasstown officials have had legislators in both the House of Representatives and the state Senate to introduce legislation amending that law to give the commission authority to issue such a permit.

Aside from the fact that the practice is, we believe, offensive in its unjustifiable cruelty to animals, do we really want our legislators taking time to debate such a practice when so many more serious issues need their attention?



Comments
(1)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
UnseasonablyReasonable
|
February 09, 2013
That's a law we didn't really need on the books in NC. Brasstown could have legally conducted their possum drop by simply using a young child and naming him/her "Possum" for the day. The activity would not have been cruelty to anyone or anything as long as a parent allowed to happen.

In NC, child abuse and abuse are generally prosecuted only AFTER the child has been harmed. But what about endangerment you might ask? In NC, child endangerment is only a misdemeanor and law enforcement officers rarely file those charges because prosecutors will rarely prosecute them, and why do all that paperwork to file a charge when you know the prosecutor won't take it seriously.

A perfect example of how that works is the recent drug-bust-gone bad in Mt. Airy where two kids were in a car when police officers fired their weapons into the car as it sped off while endangering the officers. Their bullets hit the mother of the kids, but the mother and father were not charged with child endangerment. Why, I guess since the shots hit the mother and that is evidence that the children were not in danger.

So the NC Legislature and the folks in Brasstown did all that work to allow cruelty to a possum for a few hours on New Years Eve, when all they had to do was use a child named "Possum" and they would not have had a problem at all.
Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: