Fatcow Icon
City officials want to raid savings to cut taxes
by Tom Joyce
Staff Reporter
Mar 01, 2013 | 17534 views | 6 6 comments | 5 5 recommendations | email to a friend | print
<p>Tom Joyce | The News</p><p>City Manager Barbara Jones, standing, lists city government goals Thursday afternoon during a planning retreat, including a pledge to cut the property tax rate by 2 to 4 cents. Also pictured, from left, are commissioners Jon Cawley and Scott Graham and Mayor Deborah Cochran.</p>

Tom Joyce | The News

City Manager Barbara Jones, standing, lists city government goals Thursday afternoon during a planning retreat, including a pledge to cut the property tax rate by 2 to 4 cents. Also pictured, from left, are commissioners Jon Cawley and Scott Graham and Mayor Deborah Cochran.

slideshow

Historically, Mount Airy’s commissioners have sometimes been reluctant to take money from city savings to balance the budget, but a majority of those presently serving advocates doing that to ensure a property tax reduction.

“Our citizens out there are hurting,” Commissioner Jon Cawley said Thursday afternoon during the last day of a city government planning retreat when goals, including lowering taxes, were set. City Manager Barbara Jones subsequently was directed to initiate a cut of 2 to 4 cents per $100 of assessed valuation when preparing the 2013-2014 budget.

Cawley said people are still suffering from a bad economy that doesn’t seem to be on the mend. “If it gets much worse, maybe Jesus will come back.”

In addition to wanting to give a financial break to municipal taxpayers, Cawley and others said there is a moral issue involved to continue a promise made in 2011 to reduce the tax rate by 10 cents over a five-year period. That was halted last year, when the commissioners opted not to cut amid a tight budget outlook — but the city still ended up adding to its general fund savings, which now amount to $11.8 million.

“I think we need to stand by what we said we were going to do,” Commissioner Shirley Brinkley said Thursday. Even though she wasn’t on the board when the 2011 pledge was made to cut taxes by 2 cents per year, “I expected it as a citizen.” The tax rate is now 56 cents per $100 of assessed valuation. A $60 savings would result for a $150,000 house from a 4-cent decrease.

The 4-cent figure Brinkley and Cawley pressed for Thursday would get the board back on track with its pledge.

“If we had done that last year, we could have continued to do what we said,” Cawley said of the promise. As it turned out, more than $200,000 was added in savings, while still meeting several budget challenges including purchasing an aerial fire truck.

“It sounds unanimous that all the commissioners want some kind of tax break — and I agree with that as well,” Mayor Deborah Cochran said.

Much of Thursday’s budget discussion included verbal jousting between Cawley and the city manager on the question of if the savings should be dipped into, and by how much, although Cawley said he was in no way criticizing Jones.

On Wednesday during the first day of the retreat, board members had been presented with $2.8 million in capital outlay requests from various departments, $3.8 million when the water and sewer unit — which has a separate budget — is included.

Those requests reflect various vehicle and equipment needs, including addressing failing HVAC systems at some municipal facilities, although Jones acknowledged Thursday that she wouldn’t recommended funding all the requests.

Commissioners also were told Wednesday that Mount Airy will be losing about a half-million dollars in revenues next year from multiple sources, compared to what was received from them for the present fiscal year.

A “Need” To Spend

On Thursday, board members said using money from savings is a way to both fund needed capital expenses as well as cut taxes.

Commissioner Scott Graham, referring to the delaying of such expenditures in recent years due to the high cost of some, said it is unfair to put those urgent needs on the backs of future boards. He believes the present commissioners shouldn’t be afraid to make such hard decisions.

“If we’re not willing to do that, we need another job — we need to be doing something else,” Graham said. “We need to start spending money (for capital needs), because it’s going to bite somebody on the (butt).”

“I don’t think we can keep putting things off,” Commissioner Steve Yokeley agreed. “We need to have a plan to replace some of the problem areas.”

The People’s Money

There was debate Thursday on how much could be taken from savings and still have a healthy fund balance. Jones said one rule of thumb is that 85 percent of the general fund for the present year’s budget should be maintained, which would be in the $10 million range given this year’s $11.7 million budget. That gives the board around $2 million to “play with,” the discussion indicated.

“A lot of municipalities have less than 40 percent in savings” in comparison to their operating budgets, Cawley said.

But the city manager urged a conservative approach on this. “Although we do have a healthy fund balance, I just want to caution us from using (it),” Jones said. It was mentioned Thursday that unexpected expenses could arise, such as costs from the new health-care reform program.

Cawley then reminded of his desire to help citizens in a back economy, pointing out that they don’t have what the city does in savings. And he pointed out that this money came from the people in the first place and does not belong to city officials.

The commissioner added, “It seems to me that the city of Mount Airy should be in similar financial shape as its citizens” and speculated that most local residents don’t have a year’s worth of savings at their disposal.

“Every year you’ve been manager, you’ve put money in there,” Cawley told Jones regarding the account in question. “We have put money in savings every year in a horrible economy.”

While also allocating the use of city savings, Graham did say that he would prefer to try to identify the most-pressing needs rather than simply spending the extra money from the fund. “I hate to see us decide on what we need on the basis of what we’ve got.”

Graham also said he would support the 2-cent tax cut for next year rather than the 4-cent one, just to be on the safe side with citizens. “When you promise somebody something and take it back, it’s a whole lot worse.”

The city manager, meanwhile, said she would embrace the commissioners’ directive when preparing the 2013-2014 budget during the spring.

“I will make every effort to do everything we talked about,” Jones said. “I will make every effort to reach the (tax-cut) goal of two to four cents.”

Reach Tom Joyce at 719-1924 or tjoyce@civitasmedia.com.

Comments
(6)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
mountwhere?
|
March 01, 2013
Poor leadership at the helm. IMO, a Master's in Public Administration should be a requirement to even be considered. Huge difference in being an assistant working for the city for umpteen years vs. being behind the wheel. Just because someone's served as an assistant doesn't necessarily mean they're cut out for the big job. Should have went with someone with the education AND experience of being the "big cheese" of a city in difficult times rather than giving it to a long time city employee.
Robespierre
|
March 01, 2013


Mount Airy has no vision but the problem is there is no corrective lens in the world to help it see.
UnseasonablyReasonable
|
March 01, 2013
Mt. Airy tends to elect and hire good people with good intentions. But elected officials often set the bar pretty low when it comes to benchmarking with other municipalities. And very few are consumed by flaming intellectual curiosity. There is also the community factor: if you commit to reducing taxes, your neighbors expect you to do it, regardless of the long-term impact on the balance sheet or the future cost of delaying needed capital expenditures.
Mason'sPapa
|
March 01, 2013
Cityies can do one of two things: be in a financial position to enable growth; or they can acquise to the small group of citizens that can see no further than their own personal financial nose and eliminate the cities ability take advantage of a future non-forseen opportunity or need.

Please take a deep breathe and see the larger longer picture. If you want busy work in the mean time, start reviewing your subdivison rules that make it very difficult for developers.

Take a long hard look at the utilities as an "enterprise". The state statutes no only allow it, they encourage it. Good and different rules for the expansion of our water and sewer services could be a god send to encourage development.

A hundred or two hundred dollar reduction in my taxes really will not do much for me, for this community, for the development of the business base of our community.

Look longer term.
bchbum
|
March 01, 2013
A reduction of less than $100 in property tax is not going to do much in helping the average homeowner, but the aggrate total will go a long way to forstall any tax increases in the future. Invest it wisely.
UnseasonablyReasonable
|
March 01, 2013
During uncertain times, prudent business executives all include one basic strategy in their budgetary planning: preserve capital. So the application of this strategy in the City's current setting would suggest that reserves should be preserved or expanded, rather than used to give a 'feel good' tax reduction of 2-4 cents. Should economic conditions get worse, an increase to fund capital projects to to offset the impact of property tax devaluation would not only feel bad, but would undercut the credibility of the Board of Commissioners. In times like this, it is never imprudent to build reserves. So the City's choice is easy: use its reserves to invest in financial security or political capital created by a feel good tax reduction.
Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: