Fatcow Icon
Backroom politics still alive and well in Surry County?
Aug 01, 2012 | 2445 views | 3 3 comments | 11 11 recommendations | email to a friend | print

Oftentimes, when someone goes on and on about how they are not trying to do something wrong, that’s because the person knows he’s trying to convince himself rather than those he is speaking with.

That’s what the Surry County Board of Commissioners sounds like, when board member Paul Johnson stated over and over they weren’t doing anything underhanded in the way they have gone about replacing the late Garry Scearce, who died July 22.

We hope Johnson and the rest of the board have been able to convince themselves, because their arguments sure have not convinced us, and we suspect most of the general public is feeling their county government is being a little less-than-open in this whole process as well.

The board announced Monday night it would be announcing Scearce’s replacement on Thursday, at 4 p.m. at the Surry County Republican Headquarters in Mount Airy.

“We’re Republicans and we’re appointing a Republican to take a Republican’s place.”

He might just as well have been saying “We’re a good ol’ boys club, and we’ve decided on another good ol’ boy to join our club.”

That’s not to cast criticism on the Republican Party, but on the board of commissioners, because this whole move smacks of back-door, closed-government shenanigans this board is becoming known for.

Scearce was a member of the Republican party, thus state law requires a member of the GOP to be appointed. While partisan politics really has no place in local elections, Surry County has chosen — long ago — to make it a part of choosing the county commissioners, thus the state law applies here. We get that.

And we understand that under state law, the board of commissioners is compelled to consult with the local GOP head, if that person chooses to exercise that right. The head of the local party even has the right to make a recommendation on filling the seat.

And for all we know the board could be selecting a woman, rather than another man, but that means little when you look at the way this is being done.

In filling this vacancy, any and all deliberations should have been open to the public, perhaps in concert with the local GOP. First, for those who might want to apply for the position, and second, for public comment on what those in Scearce’s district were hoping to see in an appointee. And most certainly any and all discussion among board members on this most important decision should have been conducted in open session.

As it is, we don’t know when these commissioners decided on a replacement, or how. Did such discussions take place in an unannounced meeting? In closed session? In some telephone conference, or a clandestine meeting in a back room or public park somewhere? Did the board get together with the local GOP leadership and hammer out some deal, away from public scrutiny?

Is this person someone who will encounter extreme resistance from those in the district? Overwhelming support?

As for the location of the announcement — we think the commissioners would do well to remember this is not a Republican seat, it is a county government seat which should be representative of all voters in the district, a seat which just happens to be held at present by the Republican Party. The announcement should be made in the county administration building in Dobson — the county seat — rather than in a political headquarters in Mount Airy.

We seem to find ourselves saying this often when discussing actions by this board, but we will say it once again — the residents of Surry County, and particularly those in the Mount Airy District, deserve better.



Comments
(3)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
emd
|
August 02, 2012
This editorial hit the nail on the head. Yes, of course, the Republican party is entitled to appoint the replacement, by statute, but the discussion of the replacement should be in public, with public input possible. This is not rocket science. By presenting the public with a done deed, absent any opportunity for a public conversation, it appears that the citizens of Surry county are force-fed the decision by a good old boy cabal. We hear a lot of blabber about transparency and open government, but this is anything but.

Further, this announcement should be made on county property at the county seat, since this appointee is to serve all the citizens of Surry county. Right?
khewn
|
August 01, 2012
"While partisan

politics really has no place in local elections,

Surry County has chosen — long ago — to

make it a part of choosing the county

commissioners"...

I couldn't disagree more with that statement. I believe partisan politics play a very important roll in government. It is by this method that we (the voting public) can quickly determine which candidates ideals are more in line with our own. It is a process that is just as valuable locally as it is on a national stage. Why would we worry about a checks and balance system at the state and federal level and not do it in the areas closest to us. While anyone could easily pose as a member of one party just to be elected it can just as simply be done in a non-partisan race (and it has been).

A non-partisan local board can, and often does, become a mini version of the increasingly dangerous, non-partisan, United Nations. In all honesty... such a system is really another way of saying 'Politically Correct'. The local level is 'The Place', if any, where a thorough vetting of the candidates should be done. A veil of anonymity such as this can before one the luxury of appearing to concerned while not really taking a stand one way or another.

I realize that the City of Mount Airy (along with many other small towns) use a non-partisan election process but I've never thought that it was a healthy one. I have more respect for the person who will align themselves with a set of ideals, on one side or the other, than the one who keeps their morals hidden in the neutral zone.
pkent
|
August 01, 2012
This editorial goes a little overboard in its suggestion that local Republicans should have had a more open process for selecting a Rebulican to fill the open seat on the County Board of Commissioners. This is a political appointment. Get over it. The local Republicans are trying to settle on the best candidate to run against Kate Apler in two years. They know that an appointed incumbent has a leg up over any candidate, even a truly outstanding and qualified candidate like Apler. So the race for the next election cycle is on. The only part of the process that has a bit of weirdness about it is the fact that the announcement will not be held at a scheduled meeting of the Board of Commissioners. I guess they thought if they appointed Michele Hunter at the Republican Headquarters, it would feel more like an announcement of her candidacy, rather than a dignified replacement of a commissioner who died in office. The Republicans felt that spiking the ball in the end zone was the best way to honor Mr. Scearce's memory.
Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: