Fatcow Icon
PART decision a refreshing move
Apr 17, 2012 | 1854 views | 2 2 comments | 8 8 recommendations | email to a friend | print

The Piedmont Authority for Regional Transportation (PART) is proposing a reduction in the number of times it runs routes into parts of Surry County, with a May 9 public hearing set for the plan.

PART’s reasoning is simple: the routes are not paying for themselves. Executive Director Brent McKinney said last week that the organization is working to strengthen its financial base, and in so doing, “We must reduce routes we cannot afford,” he said.

While it is regrettable to see any such regional transportation program cut back on its services, particularly on those which service some Surry County residents, this approach is a welcome change to PART’s modus operandi from the past. That generally included going to the localities it serviced, including Surry, and asking — sometimes nearly demanding — more public subsidies, rather than figuring out ways to make the operation financially self-sufficient.

The Surry County Board of Commissioners rightly said no to such requests in recent years, whether those took the form of asking the board to impose a fee on county residents purchasing private vehicle registrations, or a straight-up disbursement from the county general fund.

The commissioners were of a mind that PART should do more to make itself financially sound, rather than asking for hand-outs, and we agree that was the right decision.

Now, it seems PART officials are moving in that direction, and we applaud them for such. We do, however, believe PART plays an increasingly important role for Surry County residents, so we encourage them and county officials to attend the May 9 hearing to let their opinions be heard.

The hearing is scheduled for 8:30 a.m. at the PART office, 7800 Airport Center Drive, in Greensboro.



Comments
(2)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
pkent
|
April 18, 2012
The logic of eliminating any government service that does not immediately pay for itself is inconsistent with the approach our government has taken historically. Had we taken this approach in the past, we would not have our interstate highway system, our regional airports, our public libraries, and most of our government-supported cultural instutions, art museums, subways in major cities, state universities, local secondary schools, public hospitals and state and national parks. Fortunately, of course we would have internet cafes, the NC Educational Lottery, and newspapers.
CONSERVATIVE2YOU
|
April 19, 2012
WOW, Anything the Government touches fails, The Post Office, Solyndra, The GSA, The Stimulas. The Affordable Health Care Law ( OBAMA CARE ). This Obama Care will do more harm than anybody knows. BAD LEGISLATION! Yet you keep voting in these Professional Politicians. Sorry, but I didn't vote for this Administration and will not this time. Entitlements are the problem. Too many are getting Government Assistance instead of doing some type of work. This has been going on around us and we don't do anything about it. TIME TO VOTE THEM OUT! Good Bye Obummer!!!!! Part is a Big Problem, it is Funded by Grants from the Government and they wanted YOU to help pay for it my charging you for registering each car YOU owned. That did not work and they will try something else. You can count on that my friends.The Camel has it's nose under the tent. Wake Up!
Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: